The extent of government intervention in the public health system and individual freedoms during the Covid-19 pandemic: a theoretical analysis
The concept of individual freedom has complex and multifaceted dimensions that significantly affect the limits of permissible government interventions aimed at restricting such freedoms and maintaining public health. Therefore, the boundary between individual freedom and the social obligations of the government must be carefully clarified. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the need for such clarifications clearly increased. This study intended to investigate the concept of freedom according to major theories and to observe their application in analyzing the relations between individuals and the government in the health system, particularly during public health emergencies.The findings revealed that “justice-based”, “development-based” and “accountability-based” conceptions of freedom provide a more appropriate rationale for implementation of public health restrictive measures by health authorities during infectious disease outbreaks including pandemics such as COVID-19. Even in minimal governments that are built upon a free-market system and unrestricted conception of individuals’ freedom, such public health interventions are justifiable in the light of the ‘Catastrophic Moral Horror’ where there is an extreme risk to the health of citizens.
Sen A. Development as Freedom, 2nded. UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Kellermann AJ, De Hann J, De Vries F. Financial Supervision in the 21st Century. Germany: Springer Book; 2013.
Habibnejhad S A, Moazzen V. Ethical Challenges of Restrictions on Citizens’ Health choices by the Government. IJMEHM. 2020; 13: 306-18.
Heskett J. What Is the Government’s Role in US Health Care? USA: Harvard Business School; 2007.
Burdine JN, McLeroy KB, Gottlieb N H. Ethical dilemmas in health promotion: an introduction. Health Educ Q. 1987;14(1):7-9.
Braun K. Bio politics and temporality in Arendt and Foucault. Time & Society. 2007; 16(1): 5-23.
Nussbaum MC. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics. 2003; 9(2-3): 33–59.
Powers M, Faden RR. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Kelman S. Regulation and paternalism. Public Policy. 1981; 29(2): 219-54.
Tschudin V. Ethics in Nursing, The Caring Relationship. 3rded. UK: Butterworth-Heinemann: 2003.
Sugden R. Welfare, resources, and capabilities: a review of inequality re-examined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature. 1993; 31:1947-62.
Harlan B. Capability as opportunity: how Amartya Sen revises equal opportunity. The Journal of Religious Ethics. 2002; 30(1):107-35.
Sen A. The Idea of Justice. USA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2011.
WHO. Ethical Framework for WHO’s work in the ACT-Accelerator. [cited on 2023]; Available from: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/WHO-2019-nCoV-ACT-Accelerator-Ethical-framework-2021.1-eng-1.pdf
Thomas R, Unruh L. The Economics of Health Reconsidered. USA: Health Administration Press; 1998.
Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. USA: Basic Books Press; 1974.
Sandel MJ. Liberalism and The Limits of Justice. 2nded. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
Rawls J. Political Liberalism. USA: Columbia University Press; 2005.
Cohen GA. On The Currency of Egalitarian Justice. USA: Princeton University Press. 2011.
Daniels N, Kennedy BP, Kawachi I. Why justice is good for our health: the social determinants of health inequalities. Daedalus.1999; 128(4):215-51.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. USA: Harvard University Press;1999.
Crandall JE. Adlers concept of social interest theory, measurement, and implications for adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1980; 39(3): 481-95.
Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997; 26(4): 303-50.
Berlin I. Four Essays On Liberty. UK: Oxford University Press; 1969.
|Issue||Vol 16 (2023)|
|Covid-19; Individual freedom; Government intervention; Public health measures.|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|