<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2008-0387</Issn>
      <Volume>19</Volume>
      <Issue>0</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>06</Month>
        <Day>13</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Rethinking health and disease in the age of the cyborg: Conceptual challenges for philosophy of medicine</title>
    <FirstPage>1669</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>1669</LastPage>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Monajemi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Philosophy of Science and Technology Department, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran.</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>12</Month>
        <Day>23</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>21</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Concepts of health and disease occupy a foundational position within medicine, shaping clinical decision-making, research agendas, public health policies, and ethical evaluation. Despite their differences, both naturalistic and normativist approaches to health and disease share an organism-centered orientation. While these frameworks have offered important insights, their underlying assumptions have become increasingly difficult to sustain in contemporary medical practice.
&#xD;

Advances in medical technology have produced forms of embodiment in which implantable devices, long-term pharmacological regulation, neurotechnological interventions, and algorithmic decision systems play a constitutive role in regulating bodily functions and clinical judgment. In such contexts, technology can no longer be understood as merely external to a self-contained organism. Drawing on the concept of the cyborg condition, this paper analyzes the growing interdependence between biological and technological elements in medicine.&#xA0;Against this background, the paper critically examines naturalistic and normativist theories, focusing on their reliance on biological norms and species-typical functioning. As technological interventions become pervasive, distinctions between natural and artificial, internal and external, and therapy and enhancement grow increasingly unstable.Rather than proposing a complete alternative theory, the paper highlights the limits of existing frameworks and argues for a more relational and systemic view in which health and disease are understood as features of human-technology systems.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/article/view/1669</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/article/download/1669/488</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
