Articles

Organizational behavior of employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Organizational behaviors are commonly acknowledged as fundamentals of organizational life that strongly influence both formal and informal organizational processes, interpersonal relationships, work environments, and pay and promotion policies. The current study aims to investigate political behavior tendencies among employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS).
This cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study was conducted on 810 TUMS employees at the headquarters of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran during 2010-2011. The research tool for data collection was a researcher-tailored questionnaire on political behaviors. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by seven management professors, and its reliability was tested by a pilot study using test-retest method which yielded a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.71. The respondents were asked to fill the questionnaire and express their perceptions and tendencies to engage in organizational behaviors. The collected data was read to and analyzed by IBM SPSS environment and correlation analytical methods.
Overall, 729 respondents filled and returned the questionnaire yielding a response rate of 90%. Most of the respondents indicated that they had no tendency to engage in political behavior. Moreover, we found that there was a significant correlation between sex, higher education degrees, tenure and the employees' tendency to engage in political behavior.   
The participants were not overtly political because of their personal belief, ethical values, and personal characters. Non-political and overtly political employees are both prejudicial for all organizations. Therefore, it seems that the medium rate of good political behavior is vital and prevalent in Iranian organizations.

Ferris GR, Davidson SL, Perrewe PL. Political skill at work: impact on work effectiveness. Mountain View, CA: Davis- Black Publishing; 2005.

Kacmar KM, Ferris GR. Perceptions of organizational politics. J Manage 1992; 18(4): 93-116.

Hooper M. The motivational bases of political behavior: a new concept and measurement procedure. Public Opin Q 1983; 47(4): 497-515.

Rama Rao VS. Factors contributing to political behavior. Citeman Network, Online Business Community Knowledge. http://www.citeman.com/3729-factors-contributing-to-political-behavior (accessed in 2008).

Madison DL, Allen RW, Porter LW, Renwick PA, Mayes BT. Organizational politics: an exploration of managers’ perceptions. http://hum.sagepub.com/content/33/2/79.short (accessed in 2011).

Ashforth BE, Lee RT. Defensive behavior in organizations: a preliminary model. Human Relations 1990; 43 (7): 621-48.

Vigoda-Gadot E. Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: a five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. J Public Adm Res Theory 2007; 17 (2): 285-305.

Vigoda-Gadot E, Vinarski-Peretz H, Ben-Zion E. Politics and image in the organizationsl landscape: an empirical examination among public sector. J Manag Psychol 2003; 18(8): 764-87.

Valle M, Perrewe PL. Do politics perceptions relate to political behaviors? Tests of an implicit assumption and expanded model. Hum Relat 2000; 53(3): 359-86.

Larimer CW, Hannagan RJ. Gender differences in follower behavior. Politics Life Sci 2010; 29(2): 40-54.

DuBrin AJ. Sex differences in endorsement of influence tactics and political behavior tendencies. J Bus Psychol 1989; 4(1): 3-14.

Steel G. Gender and political behavior in Japan. Soc Sci Japan J 2004; 7(2): 223-244.

Keith PM. A comparison of general and age-specific factors associated with political behavior. Exp Aging Res 1977; 3(4- 6): 289-304.

Ralston DA, Giacalone RA, Terpstra RH. Ethical perceptions of organizational politics: a comparative evaluation of American and Hong Kong managers. J Bus Ethics 1994; 13(12): 989-99.

Vigoda E. Reactions to organizational politics: a cross-cultural examination in Israel and Britain. Hum Relat 2001; 54(1): 1483-518.

Torres-Gil F, Becerra RM. The political behavior of the Mexican-American elderly. Gerontologist 1977; 17(5): 392-9.

Peterson SA, Somit A. The political behavior of older American Blacks. Gerontologist 1992; 32(5): 592-600.

Klecka WR. Applying political generations to the study of political behavior: A cohort analysis. Public Opin Q 1971; 35(3): 358-73.

Conner DS. Human resource professionals’ perceptions of organizational politics as a function of experience, organization- al size, and perceived independence. J Soc Psychol 2006; 146(6): 717-32.

Muhammad AH. Antecedents of organizational politics perceptions in Kuwait business organizations. J Glob Compet 2007; 17(4): 234-47.

Poon ML. Trust-in-supervisor and helping coworkers: moderating effect of perceived politics. J Manag Psychol 2006; 21(6): 518-32.

Gilmore DC, Ferris GR, Dulebohn JH, Harrell-Cook G. Organizational politics and employee attendance. Group Organ Manag 1996; 21(4): 481-94.

Poon JML. Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics perceptions. J Manag Psychol 2003; 18(2): 138- 55.

Ferris GR, Frink DD, Galang MC, Zhou J, Kacmar KM, Howard JL. Perceptions of organizational politics: prediction,

stress-related implications, and outcomes. Hum Relat 1996; 49(2): 233-66.

Fritsch J. Toward a theory of personal politics. Hum Resor Dev Rev 2010; 9(3): 226-48.

Comer DR. Preparing students to determine personally appropriate political behavior. http://jme.sagepub.com/content/16/3/327 (accessed in 2010).

Kolodinsky RW, Treadway DC, Ferris GR. Political skill and influence effectiveness: testing portions of expanded Ferris and Judge (1991) model. Hum Relat 2007; 60(2): 1747-77.

Biberman G. Personality and characteristic work attitudes of persons with high, moderate, and low political tendencies. Psychol Rep 1985; 57: 1303-10.

Witt LA, Hilton TF, Hochwarter WA. Addressing politics in matrix team. Group Organ Manage 2001; 26(2): 230-47.

Cropanzano R, Howes JC, Grandey AA, Toth P. The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. J Organ Behav 1997; 18(2): 159-80.

Hochwarter WA, Treadway DC. The interactive effects of negative and positive affect on the politics perceptions-job satisfaction relationship. J Manage 2003; 29(4): 551-67.

Witt LA, Andrews MC, Kacmar KM. The role of participation in decision-making in the organizational politics-job satisfaction relationship. Hum Relat 2000; 53(3): 341-58.

Wilson PA. A theory of power and politics and their effects on organizational commitment of senior executive service members. Adm Soc 1999; 13(1): 120-41.

Breaux DM, Munyon TP, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR. Politics as a moderator of the accountability-job satisfaction relationship: evidence across three studies. J Manag 2009; 35(2): 307-26.

Katrinli A, Atabay G, Gunay G, Canagarli BG. Nurses perceptions of individual and organizational political reasons for horizontal peer bullying. Nurs Ethics 2010; 17(5): 614-27.

Geisce LY. Administrator Perceptions of Political Behavior During Planned Organizational Change. ProQuest; 2009.

Gadot EV. Leadership style, organizational politics, and employee’s performance: an empirical examination of two competing models. Personal Rev 2007; 36 (5): 661-83.

Files
IssueVol 5 (2012) QRcode
SectionArticles
Keywords
Organizational behavior, Employee, Organizational ethics.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Dargahi H. Organizational behavior of employees of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2012;5.