Original Article

Policy considerations to achieve practical ethics: closing the gap between ethical theory and practice

Abstract

Social and professional behaviors are driven by extrinsic as well as intrinsic factors including executive rules and regulations enacted by extrinsic agents through coercion, police force and penalties. Despite their effectiveness, these mechanisms undermine the fact that ethics is an intrinsic human quality. The present study seeks strategies to apply extrinsic coercion as an incentive to direct ethics as an intrinsic value.
Ethical behaviors driven by intrinsic motivations are more permanent and less costly. Legal force can either strengthen or weaken intrinsic requirements. Extrinsic conditions such as considering the interests, attitudes and preferences of others, involving people in the regulation and execution of law, justification of law, avoiding excessive punishment or rewards, and indirect support of ethics by establishing the appropriate social context can help boost intrinsic requirements in individuals.
Ethics will not be practically established unless we harness individuals’ ‘willingness to act’ as an essential determinant for ethical behavior. This requires adoption of a more psychological approach to ethics. If this aspect of ethical behavior is considered in regulations and executive processes, extrinsic forces can strengthen intrinsic requirements and spread ethics.

Nolen-Hoeksema S, Fredrickson BL, Loftus GR, Wagenaar WA. Atkinson & Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology. 15th ed. UK: Wadsworth Pub; 2009, p. 2-681.

Rest JR, Narvaez D, Thoma SJ, Bebeau M. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1999, pp. 100-4.

Hume D. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. UK: Oxford University Press; 1998, p. 28.

Huebner B, Dwyer S, Hauser M. The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009;13(1): 1-6.

Dunbar WS. Emotional engagement in professional ethics. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005;11(4): 535-51.

Mencl J, May DR. The effects of proximity and empathy on ethical decision-making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Business Ethics. 2009; 85(2): 201-26.

Campion B. Virtue ethics and health care ethics: part1: the good doctor. Bioethics Matters. 2011; 9(2):1-4.

Neibuhr R. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics, 2nd ed. USA: Westminster John Knox Press; 2013.

Koller P. Law, morality and virtue. In: Walker RL, Ivanhoe PJ, eds. Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. UK: Oxford University Press; 2007, p. 191-206.

Santrock JW. Psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2003, Chapter 11.

Bohner G, Wanke M. Attitudes and Attitude Change (Social Psychology: A Modular Course). UK: Psychology Press; 2002, p.19-250.

Kuczynski L, Navara GS. Sources of innovation and change in socialization, internalization and acculturation. In: Killen M, Smetana JG, eds. Handbook of Moral Development, 2nd ed. USA: Routledge; 2006, p. 299-330.

Aronson E. The Social Animal. New York: Worth Publishers; 2004, Chapter 5.

14.Tenbrunsel AE, Messick DM. Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research. 2004; 17(2): 223-36.

Madani M, Larijani B, Madani E, Ghasemzadeh N. Establishment of medical education upon internalization of virtue ethics: bridging the gap between theory and practice. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2017;10: 3.

Thomas L. Moral psychology. In: Becker LC, Becker CB, eds. Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed. USA: Routledge; 2001, Vol. 2, p.1144-50.

Kadivar P. [Ravanshenasi Akhlagh]. Tehran: Agah Publication; 2010, p.86-8. [in Persian]

Salge C, Glackin C, Polani D. Changing the environment based on empowerment as intrinsic motivation. Entropy. 2014; 16(5): 2789-819.

Robbins SP, Judge T. Motivation: from concepts to applications organizational. In: Robbins SP, Judge T. Behavior. London: Pearson; 2007.

Coombs RH. Social participation, self-concept and interpersonal valuation. Sociometry. 1969; 32(3): 273-86.

Golabi, F, Rezayi, A. The Impact of social participation on social tolerance. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran. 2013; 2(1): 61-86. [in Persian]

Birnbache D. The Socratic method in teaching medical ethics: potentials and limitations. Med Health Care Philos. 1999; 2(3): 219-24.

Heidari A, Adeli SH, Taziki SA, et al. Teaching medical ethics: problem-based learning or small group discussion? J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013; 6: 1.

Ghazi Tabatabayee S, Hatami, J, Fardanesh, H, Majdanian, A, Eslami Z. Compare of Effectiveness of Instructional Design Inspired from Behaviourism, Cognitive, and Constructivism Theories in Social Attitudes Change. Modern Psychological Researches. 2010; 4(13): 117-137. [in Persian]

Chambers R. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World development. 1994; 22(10):1437-54.

McKee N, Manoncourt E, CHIN SY, Carnegie R. Chapter 12: Involving people, evolving behavior: The UNICEF experience. In: Servaes J. Approaches to Development Communication, Paris: UNESCO; 2002.

Al-Jammal HR, Al-Khasawneh AL, Hamadat MH. The impact of the delegation of authority on employees’ performance at great Irbid municipality: case study. International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 2015; 5(3): 48-69.

Hatami, H. A study of the effect of delegation of authority with productivity of human resources in first region of Islamic Azad University. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. 2013; 3[3(12)]: 49-62. [in Persian]

Kane-Urrabazo C. Management's role in shaping organizational culture. J Nurs Manag. 2006; 14(3): 188-94.

Zareei MH, Taheri F, Sayyar A. Organizational silence: concepts, antecedents, and consequences. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences. 2012 (21): 77-104. [in Persian]

Vakola M, Bouradas D. Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation. Employee Relations. 2005; 27(5): 441-58.

Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review. 2000; 25(4): 706-25.

Ghorbanian H, Haratiannejadi M. The right of diseases and the role of governmental and private departments. Medical Law Journal. 2007; 1(2) :11-41. [in Persian]

Gharamaleki F, Sekandari M. [Akhlagh Dar Sazemanhaye Mardomnahad]. Tehran: [ Nahad Riasat Jomhouri; Markaz Omur Zanan va Khanevadeh]; [1388], p: 71-83. [in Persian]

Files
IssueVol 13 (2020) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v13i8.4075
Keywords
Intrinsic and extrinsic coercion; Ethics and law interaction; Policies and intrinsic motivation; Social ethics

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Madani M, Ghasemzadeh N, Dizani A, Faramarz Gharamaleki A, Larijani B. Policy considerations to achieve practical ethics: closing the gap between ethical theory and practice. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020;13.