Pharmacy ethics: evaluation pharmacists’ ethical attitude
,
Abstract
Alterations in pharmacy practice from prescription dispensing to more patient-centered relationship intensifies the necessity of clinical decision-making. Pharmacists' knowledge as well as ethical reasoning affects their clinical decision-making. Unfortunately in Iran pharmacy ethics did not develop along with medical ethics and special considerations are of major importance. The study was designed to evaluate pharmacists' attitude toward some principles of bioethics.
A cross-sectional survey was performed on a sample of Iranian pharmacists attended in continuous education programs in 2010. Based on the pharmacists' attitude toward common ethical problems, 9 Likert-type scale scenarios were designed. A thousand pharmacists were surveyed and 505 questionnaires were filled. For the whole questionnaire the strongly disagree answer was the most ethical answer. On a scale from 1-5 on which 5=strongly disagree, the total score of pharmacists ethical attitude was 17.69 ± 3.57. For easier analysis we considered the score of 1 for agree and strongly agree answers, score of 2 for neutral answers and score of 3 for disagree and strongly disagree answers. The total score in confidentiality for all participants was 4.15 ± 1.45 out of 9, in autonomy 6.25 ± 1.85 out of 9, in non-maleficence 5.14 ± 1.17 out of 6 and in justice was 2.27 ± 0.89 out of 3, however there was no significant difference between men and women in the total score and the score of each theme. The older participants (> 40 years) significantly had lower total score (P< 0.05) as well as the score of each theme (P< 0.05), except for non-maleficence. The work experience showed impact on the pharmacists' attitude toward autonomy and the participants with more than 5 years work experience significantly obtained lower score in this theme.
Compiling ethical guidelines and improving pharmacy ethics curriculum is highly critical to provide the best pharmaceutical care and to make clinical decisions in critical situations. Therefore further quantitative and qualitative investigations into finding pitfalls and challenges in this issue are highly recommended.
Rawwas MYA, Vitell SJ, Festervand TA. Ethical attitudes of pharmacists. Health Mark Q 1994; 12: 97-112.
Wingfield J, Bissell P, Anderson C. The scope of pharmacy ethics—an evaluation of the international research literature 1990-2002. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 2383-96.
Cooper R, Bissell P, Wingfield J. A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature. J Med Ethics 2007; 33: 82-6.
Savulescu J. Festschrift edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics in honor of Raanan Gillon: promoting respect for the four principles remains of great practical importance in ordinary medicine. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 265-7.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Tassy S, Coz PL, Wicker B. Current knowledge in moral cognition can improve medical ethics. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 679-82.
Beall JW, Broeseker AE. Pharmacy students attitudes toward death and end-of-life care. Am J Pharm Educ 2010; 74(6): 104.
Chaar BB. Professional ethics in pharmacy practice: developing a psychiatric measure of moral reasoning. Pharm World Sci 2009; 31: 439-49.
Sabbatini R. Are there differences between the brains of males and females?
http://www.cerebromente.org.br/n11/mente/eisntein/cerebro-homens.html (accessed on 2011)
Latif DA. An assessment of the ethical reasoning of United States pharmacy students: a national survey. Am J Pharm Educ 2004; 68(2): article 30. http://www.ajpe.org/aj6802/aj680230/aj680230.pdf (accessed on 2011)
Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Womens Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.
Weissman MA, Bensinger L, Koestler JL. Resident as teacher: educating the educators. Mt Sinai J Med 2006; 73(8): 1165-9.
Wiessman PF, Branch WT, Gracey CF, Haidet P, Frankel RM. Role modeling humanistic behavior: learning bedside manner from the experts. Acad Med 2006; 81: 661-7.
Nilsson MS, Pilhammar E. Professional approaches in clinical judgements among senior and junior doctors: implications for medical research. BMC Med Educ 2009; 9: 25.
Vitell S, Rawwas MYA, Festervand T. Pharmacy ethics: conflicts, practices and beliefs of pharmacists. J Business Ethics 1991; 10: 365-75.
Bebeau MJ, Thoma SJ. The impact of a dental ethics curriculum on moral reasoning. J Dent Educ 1994; 58: 684-92.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 4 (2011) | |
| Section | Articles | |
| Keywords | ||
| Pharmacy ethics, Ethical attitude, Confidentiality, Autonomy. | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
