Fetus as human being: where is the cut‐off point?
Abstract
Abortion is one of the controversial issues discussed in medical ethics. We can formulate the argument which is put forward by the opponents of abortion as follows: 1) fetus has to be regarded as human being; 2) killing an innocent human being is morally wrong; 3) aborting is an example of killing and terminating a human being's life. So, being engaged in aborting is morally wrong.
In this paper, I am going to argue that the proponents' argument with regard to the implausibility of categorizing fetus as human being is unjustified and wanting. In other words, the way in which the proponents of abortion talk about the idea of personhood is, inadequate and vague, semantically speaking. The outline of the argument is as follows. The proponents of abortion are confronted with a dilemma. According to the first horn of the dilemma, the proponents have to subscribe to infanticide which is morally wrong, intuitively speaking. According to the second horn of the dilemma, there is a semantic story which needs to be expressed by the proponents with regard to the cut-off point of the concept ‘personhood'. Otherwise, the first premise will not be convincing if raised in favour of the plausibility of committing abortion.
Anonymous, (2008). URL: http://www.vesq.org.au/Definitions.html
Martin P, Paulus MP. Neurobiology of decision-making: quo vadis? Cognitive Brain Research 2005; 23(1): 2-10.
Anonymous, (2008). URL: http://www.floridainstitute.comResourcesglossary1.html
Kahnand BE, Isen AM. The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products. J Consum Res 1993; 20 (2): 257–270.
Nygren TE, Isen AM, Taylor PJ, Dulin J. The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: focus on
outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability. Org Behav Human Decis Process 1996; 66 (1): 59– 72.
Apkarian AV, Sosa Y, Krauss BR, et al. Chronic pain patients are impaired on an emotional decision-making task. Pain 2004; 108 (1-2): 129–136.
Durant W. The Story of Civilization, 1939; vol 4.
Keefe FJ, Lumley M, Anderson T, Lynch T, Studts JL, Carson KL. Pain and emotion: new research directions. J Clin Psychol 2001; 57(4): 587–607.
Anonymous. Emotions in Decision Making, (2008). URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_in_Decision_Making
Anonymous. Emotion and decision, (2008). URL: http://changingminds.org/explanations/emotions/emotion_decision.htm
Apkarian AV, Grachev ID, Krauss BR. Imaging brain pathophysiology of chronic CRPS pain. In: Harden R, Janig W, Baron JC,eds. Complex regional pain syndrome. Seattle, WA: IASP Press; 2001a. pp. 209–27.
Apkarian AV, Krauss BR, Fredrickson BE, Szeverenyi NM. Imaging the pain of low back pain: functional magnetic resonance imaging in combination with monitoring subjective pain perception allows the study of clinical pain states. Neurosci Lett 2001; 299(1-2): 57–60.
Apkarian AV, Thomas PS, Krauss BR, Szeverenyi NM. Prefrontal cortical hyperactivity in patients with sympathetically
mediated chronic pain. Neurosci Lett 2001; 311 (3): 193–7.
Baliki MN, Geha PY, Apkarian AV, Chialvo DR. Beyond feeling: chronic pain hurts the brain, disrupting disrupting the default mode network dynamics. J Neurosci 2008; 28(6): 1398-403.
George S, Rogers RD, Duka T. The acute effect of alcohol on decision making in social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 2005;182 (1): 160–9.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 2 (2009) | |
| Section | Articles | |
| Keywords | ||
| Abortion, Fetus, Human. | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
