Original Article

Human dignity: a contract or an abstract?

Abstract

Although human dignity has been the focus of many researchers, fundamental debates about its existence have often been ignored. Different views on human dignity and its existence can lead to divergent interpretations of human rights. In this study, we attempted to find an answer to the question of the nature of human dignity by examining and collecting the opinions of experts and analyzing and criticizing them. Our analysis showed that since dignity is linked to human existence and understanding, it has a subjective nature. Subjective existences have different types, including contractual and abstract. Contractual existence finds its way to objective entities through human thought, and it is changeable. An abstract existence, on the other hand, is created by perception of an objective entity in a constant way among human beings. Human dignity is consistent with the contractual type, because simply seeing a human does not bring to mind the existence of dignity and human rights. Once we accept the contractual nature of dignity, we must determine who bestowed this dignity on man. Through investigations, we came to the conclusion that God is the only one that can grant such privilege, and the existence of dignity for humans is a proof of God's existence.

Tirosh-Samuelson H. In praise of human dignity. The humanities in the age of big data. on education Journal for research and debate. 2018;1(2).

Michael L. Defining dignity and its place in human rights. The New Bioethics. 2014;20(1):12-34.

Jafari SA, Araminia B, Tavasoli H, Tavasoli N, Abedi S. Examining the criteria of human dignity. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. 2023;16(0).

Valentini L. Dignity and human rights: a reconceptualisation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2017;37(4):862-85.

Longkumer TJ. God does not exist, but God is: an analysis of tillich’s concept of existence. Dimapur Gov. College Journal. 2015:126.

Shirazi S. Asfar-al-Arbaa. Beirut: Al-Ehya-Al-Toras Press; 1981.

Schlink B. The concept of human dignity: Current usages, future discourses. Understanding human dignity. 2013:631-6.

Tabataba'i M. Islam and the contemporary can, Chapter 8: essence and existence: ABWA Publishing and Printing Center; 2010.

Torell K. Must values have subjective existence? Kriterion Journal of Philosophy. 2004;18(1):25-31.

Baise A. The objective–subjective dichotomy and its use in describing probability. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2020;45(2):174-85.

Aidonojie PA, Agbale OP, Odojor OA, Ikubanni OO. Human rights: between universalism and cultural relativism. AJLHR. 2021;5:97.

Hogemann ER. Human rights beyond dichotomy between cultural universalism and relativism. The Age of Human Rights Journal. 2020(14):19-36.

Igwenagu UR. The concept cultural relativism of human rights. SSRN. 4272442. 2022.

Pratiwi CS. Bridging the gap between cultural relativism and universality of human rights: Indonesia Attitudes. JILS. 2020;5:449.

Machiavel N. The prince: Lindhardt og Ringhof; 2022.

Clemens Jr WC. Grand illusions and delusions. Asian Perspective. 2021;45(3):671-82.

Falguera JL, Martinez-Vidal C, Rosen G. Abstract objects, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [cited on 2024]; Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/abstract-objects/

Kumar A. Kant on the ground of human dignity. Kantian Review. 2021;26(3):435-53.

Suleiman Amiri A. Critique of Fayyazi's arguments against prior necessity (Rule of Causal Necessity). Theosophia Practica. 2013;5(Issue 17):39-66.

Johnson Laird PN. Causes and obligations. [cited on 2024]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551330.003.0022.

Millican P. Hume on causation and causal powers. reconsidering causal powers: Historical and Conceptual Perspectives. 2021:206.

Samitharathana W. An appraisal of hume’s theory of causation: is hume a causal realist? British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies. 2023;4(4):137-44.

Gebremariam KM. Human dignity and moral rights: University of Zurich; 2016.

Maattanen P. Facts and values after David Hume. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique. 2023;36(1):17-29.

Merrill TW. Investigating morality with David Hume. Polity. 2016;48(1):82-108.

Salkever SG. “Cool reflexion” and the criticism of values: is, ought, and objectivity in Hume's social science. American Political Science Review. 1980;74(1):70-7.

Shah SJA, Ahmad S. Al-Ghazali and Hume on natural causal necessity and miracles. Al-Idah. 2021;39(1):71-83.

Files
IssueVol 17 (2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v17i6.17105
Keywords
Human; Human dignity; Human rights; Personhood; Bioethics.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Jafari SA, Aramnia B, Tavasoli H, Tavasoli N, Abedi S, Fayaz-Bakhsh A. Human dignity: a contract or an abstract?. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2024;17.