Original Article

Examining the criteria of human dignity

Abstract

One of the critical aspects in discussing human dignity is the establishment of its criterion, a standard unique to humans. This criterion should effectively create a fundamental and structural distinction from other creatures. Initially, our focus was on the endeavors of biologists to differentiate the human species from others, emphasizing the physical aspects. However, physical and genetic differences lack the necessary characteristics to serve as a criterion for dignity. Subsequently, we explored the notion of this criterion in human behavior. Yet, given that behavior stems from human thought, it proves unsuitable as a criterion for dignity. Thus, our quest led us to explore human wisdom. However, since wisdom, like other abilities, serves as a tool for improved living and is present to some extent in other animals, it proves inadequate as a criterion. We have determined that the distinguishing characteristic lies in the power of choice or free will, setting humans apart from other living beings whose behavior is solely instinctual or driven by needs. Consequently, free choice forms the foundation of dignity, assigning value to the chooser based on the choices made.

Brännmark J. Respect for persons in bioethics: towards a human rights-based account. Human Rights Review. 2017;18(2):171-87.

Moka-Mubelo W. Reconciling Law and Morality in Human Rights Discourse. 2017; p.141-94.

Harrison A. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity—Interdisciplinary Perspectives, written by Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword and Dietmar Mieth. European Journal of Health Law. 2017;24(2):221-38.

Autiero A. Human dignity in an ethical sense: basic considerations. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society. 2020;6:9-21.

Kant I, Chiodi P. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785), Fondazione della metafisica dei costumi, in Scritti morali: UTET.

Braun R, Qigek HI. New Approaches to Human Dignity in the Context of Qur'anic Anthropology. 2017.

Shojaeezand AR. Definition of Religion. Journal of Religious Thought of Shiraz University. 2013;9(30):1-26.

Aristotle. Politics. 4th. Tehran: Elmi-farhangi Publishers; 2001.

Gobineau A. [l'Orient et l'Iran (The World of the Persians)]. Tehran: Mahmood Afshar Foundation; 1985.

Kondari M. Notes about Nazism. Farhang. 1992;12(5):183-200.

Karl M. About the material evolution of history. Tehran: Agah Publishers; 2001.

Copleston F. A history of philosophy. Tehran: soroush Publishers; 2010.

Rousseau JJ. The social contract. 4th. Tehran: Chehr Publishers 1962.

Sykes S. Friedrich Schleiermacher. Tehran: Grous press; 1997.

Parkhide Q. The requirements of religious life. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences Press; 2009.

Zamani M. Metaphysic and the Aristotelian Definition of Human Being as ζώον λόγον έχον in Heidegger’s Thought. Metaphysics. 2020;12(29):113-30.

Hekmat N. The prominent lines of Ibn Arabi's anthropology. Mofid letter. 2006(53).

Parsania H. From holy wisdom to instrumental wisdom. Islamic Research center. 2005(66).

Poorsina Z. Systematization of the uses ‘reason’ in Al-Ghazali’s works. Philosophical-Theological Research. 2009;11(1 (41)):38.

Sohrevardi S. [Aql-e Sorkh]. 8th. Tehran: Molla press; 2012.

Britanica. Belief. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2023 [cited on 2023]; Available from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/belief

Hajhosseini M. Reviewing and analyzing the views of Muslim philosophers on the definition of science from Ibn Sina to Sadr al-Maltahin. Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences (Tehran University). 2002;52(164):19.

Zarinkoob R, Yazdanirad A. Zoroastrian clerics' measures to deal with religious conversion (from the fall of the Sassanid Empire to the end of the 4th century AH). [Jostarha-ye Tarixi]. 2011;2(1):99-126.

Newen A, Starzak T. How to ascribe beliefs to animals. Mind & Language. 2022;37(1):3-21.

Kierkegaard S. Frygt og Bæven. First ed. Tehran: Ney Press; 1999.

Hariri akbari M. Democracy and civil society. Journal of Social Sciences. 2006;1(1).

Mohamadrezaiee M. Freedom from Kant's point of view. Mofid letter. 2001;28.

Tavakoli G. Kierkegaard and Fideism. Mofid letter. 2001;28.

Sanei Darehbidi M. Authority and freedom in Kant's philosophy. Phlisophy Letter. 1999(8).

Malekshahi H. Description of Avicenna's Esharat va Tanbihat. First ed. Tehran: Sorush press; 2003.

Files
IssueVol 16 (2023) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v16i14.14613
Keywords
Human dignity; Criterion of dignity; Freedom of choice; Free selection of virtues; Voluntary compliance with belief.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Jafari SA, Araminia B, Tavasoli H, Tavasoli N, Abedi S, Fayaz Bakhsh A. Examining the criteria of human dignity. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2023;16.