To use or not to use? an ethical analysis of access to data and samples of a deceased patient for genetic diagnostic and research purposes
-
Mahshad Noroozi
,
Fatemeh Bahmani
,
Kazem Mousavizadeh
,
Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani
,
Akram Hashemi
,
Mina Forouzandeh
Abstract
Using genetic tests on deceased patients’ samples for diagnostic purposes affects the family members' health and lives but raises some ethical issues in today’s practice of medicine and research. In this paper, we address a common ethical dilemma of clinicians regarding whether to perform genetic tests on a deceased patient’s sample upon a request from first-degree relatives against the patient's wishes in the last days of life. In this paper, a real case scenario is presented that echoes the above-mentioned ethical challenge. Reviewing the genetic basis of the case, the ethical arguments for and against the reuse of genetic material in a clinical context are discussed. An ethico-legal analysis of the case is proposed based on Islamic medical ethics resources. As reusing stored samples of expired patients without their consent also challenges the researchers in the field of genetics, a debate is included on the post-mortem use of genetic data and samples for research.Finally, defining the special features of the presented case and positive benefit-risk ratio, it is concluded that reusing the patient's sample may be justified if the first-degree family members insist on genetic testing and are comprehensively informed about the benefits and harms.
Ascencio-Carbajal T, Saruwatari-Zavala G, Navarro-Garcia F, Frixione E. Genetic/genomic testing: defining the parameters for ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI). BMC Med Ethics. 2021; 22(1): 156. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00720-5.
Gordon D.R, Koenig B.A. “If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data.” Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens. New Genetics and Society. 2022; 41(1): 23-46. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2007065.
Bak MAR, Ploem MC, Ateşyürek H, et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28: 403–16. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0503-5.
Dove ES, Chico V, Fay M, Laurie G, Lucassen AM, Postan E. Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives? J Med Ethics. 2019; 45(8): 504-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105229.
Tadros S, Carley H, Lucassen A. From beyond the grave: use of medical information from the deceased to guide care of living relatives. Curr Genet Med Rep. 2020; 8(4):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s40142-020-00196-6.
Boers SN, van Delden JJ, Knoers NV, Bredenoord AL. Postmortem disclosure of genetic information to family members: active or passive? Trends Mol Med. 2015; 21(3): 148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.01.002.
Shamsi-Gooshki E, Parsapoor A, Asghari F, et al. Developing "Code of Ethics for Medical Professionals, Medical Council of Islamic Republic of Iran". Arch Iran Med. 2020;23(10):658-664. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.83. (Supplementary file)
Radecki Breitkopf C, Wolf SM, et al. Attitudes toward return of genetic research results to relatives, including after death: comparison of cancer probands, blood relatives, and spouse/partners. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018; 13(3): 295-304. doi: 10.1177/1556264618769165.
Xia Y, Hong Q, Gao Z, Wang S, Duan S. Somatically acquired mutations in primary myelofibrosis: A case report and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021; 21(3): 193. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9625.
Alshemmari SH, Rajan R, Emadi A. Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance of Driver Mutations in Primary Myelofibrosis: A Review. Med Princ Pract. 2016; 25(6): 501-509. doi: 10.1159/000450956.
Anonymous. Primary Myelofibrosis. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/primary-myelofibrosis/ (Access on 2022).
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021; 96(1): 145-162. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26050.
Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(4): 392-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446.
Rothstein MA. Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives. Genet Med. 2018; 20(3): 285-90. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.257.
Gordon DR, Radecki Breitkopf C, Robinson M, et al. Should researchers offer results to family members of cancer biobank participants? A mixed-methods study of proband and family preferences. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019; 10(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1546241.
Ho A. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008; 22(1): 128-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x.
Walter JK, Ross LF. Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 2014; 133 Suppl 1: S16-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3608D.
Dove ES, Kelly SE, Lucivero F, Machirori M, Dheensa S, Prainsack B. Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research? Clin Ethics. 2017; 12(3): 150-65. doi: 10.1177/1477750917704156.
McLaughlin J, Clavering E.K. Questions of kinship and inheritance in pediatric genetics: substance and responsibility. New Genetics and Society, 2011; 30(4): 399-413. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2011.592011.
Müller H, Rehmann-Sutter C (eds). Disclosure Dilemmas; Ethics of Genetic Prognosis after the 'Right to Know/Not to Know' Debate. USA: Routledge; 2016.
Konrad M. Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography and Science. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Tylor B. Evolution & kinship ethics. Available from https://humansandnature.org/evolution-kinship-ethics/. (Accessed on 2022)
Clayton EW, Evans BJ, Hazel JW, Rothstein MA. The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations. J Law Biosci. 2019; 6(1): 1-36. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz007.
Pugh J. Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics. UK: Oxford University Prss; 2020.
Anonymous. Confidentiality: good practice in handling patient information. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-guidance-for-doctors---confidentiality-good-practice-in-handling-patient-information----70080105.pdf. (Accessed on 2022)
Chamsi-Pasha H, Albar M.A. Principles of Islamic medical ethics. Journal British Islamic Med Assoc. 2019; 1(1): 1-5.
Sachedina A. Islamic Biomedical Ethics Principles and Application. USA: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Poorabhari-Langeroodi S, Asadinejad M. Place the patient in medical decisions. Medical Law Journal. 2013; 7 (27): 11-36. [In Persian]
Anonymous. The Civil Code of The Islamic Republic of Iran. Available from https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/49997adb27.pdf (Accessed on 2022).
Tariverdi S, Sadeghi MH, Abbasi M. The need to monitor the rules and regulations of organ donation in the Iranian legal system. MLJ 2021; 15(56): 611-24. [in Persian]
Saghi E, Hashemi Tonekaboni S M. A review of legal vacuums in the issue of transplanting organs taken from brain dead patients. Iran J Forensic Med. 2017; 23(1): 61-7. [In Persian]
Tassé AM. Biobanking and deceased persons. Hum Genet. 2011; 130(3): 415-23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1049-y.
Fellmann F, Rial-Sebbag E, Patch C, Hentze S, Stefandottir V, Mendes Á, van El CG, Cornel MC, Forzano F; Public and Professional Committee (PPPC) of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG). ESHG PPPC Comments on postmortem use of genetic data for research purposes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28(2): 144-146. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0525-z.
The World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki- Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/#:~:text=1.,identifiable%20human%20material%20and%20data. (Accessed on 2022)
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 15 (2022) | |
| Section | Case Report(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v15i13.11569 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Genetic information Postmortem disclosure Ethics Family members Confidentiality Consent | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
