Factors influencing the attitudes of NICU physicians toward care of neonates with very poor prognosis

Keywords: Invasive procedures; newborns; neonatal intensive care units; prognosis; resuscitation; viability


Attitudes of physicians toward neonates with poor prognosis greatly influence their decisions regarding the course of treatment and care. The present study aimed to investigate factors contributing to attitudes of medical practitioners toward poor prognosis neonates. This was a cross-sectional, descriptive-analytic study. Questionnaires for assessing subjects’ attitudes toward care of very poor prognosis neonates were administered to all neonatologists, pediatricians, neonatology assistants, and pediatric residents (a total of 88 individuals) working in the NICUs of Imam Khomeini Hospital. Participants’ attitudes were determined through analysis of responses to seven questions on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”. Presence of anomalies incompatible with an acceptable quality of life, birth weight, gestational age, responses to neonatal diagnostic tests, certain types of diseases, parental marital status and practitioner predictions about patient prognosis were the factors contributing to practitioners’ attitude (P-value < 0.005). However, no significant relationship was found in connection with religious beliefs, socioeconomic status, opinions of consulting physicians, hospital treatment protocols, standards of the Association of Neonatal Physicians, and ethics committee expectations (P-value > 0.005). It can be concluded that the attitudes of practitioners toward intensive care of poor prognosis neonates is determined by the medical condition of the neonate rather than socio-demographic characteristics.

Author Biography

Fariba Asghari, Associate Professor, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
 Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran


Tough SC, Greene CA, Svenson LW, Belik J. Effects of in vitro fertilization on low birth weight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth. J Pediatr. 2000; 136: 618-22.

Nayeri F, Aghahosseini M, Alyasin A, Nili F. Outcome of newborns conceived through artificial reproductive techniques in Tehran Iran. International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine. 2006; 4(2): 57-62.

Walsh MC, Bell EF, Kandefer S, et al. Neonatal outcomes of moderately preterm infants compared to extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2017; 82(2): 297-304.

Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(3): 262–73.

Davis A. All babies should be kept alive as far as possible. In: Richard Edmund Ashcroft RE, Angus Dawson A, Draper H, John McMillan J, eds. Principles of Health Care Ethics. 2nd ed. UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1994, p. 629-41.

Kuhse H, Singer P. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. UK: Oxford University Press; 1985, p. 238.

Carter BS, Bhatia J. Comfort /palliative care guideline for neonatal practice development and implementation in an academic medical center. J Perinatol. 2001; 21(5): 279-83.

Verlagen AA, and Sauer PJ. End of life decision in newborn an approach from the Netherlands. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(3): 736-9.

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Bell EF. Noninition or withdrawell of intensive care for high-risk newborn. Pediatrics. 2007; 119(2): 401-3.

Rabiu AR1, Sugand K. Has the sanctity of life law 'gone too far'?: Analysis of the sanctity of life doctrine and English case law shows that the sanctity of life law has not 'gone too far'. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014; 22; 9:5.

Raines DA, Redman B. Level of management in neonatal clinical situations. In: Redman BK. Measurement Tools in Clinical Ethics, 1th ed. USA; Sage Publication; 2001, p.232-36.

Rebaglioto M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decision making: physician’s attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA. 2000; 284(19): 2451-9.

Ghaffari Saravi V, Zarghami M, Sheikh Moonesi F, Moodi S, Khadem F, Karami M. Attitude and practice of pediatrics and gynecology physicians in the cities of Sari and Babol regarding non-initiation and discontinuation of resuscitation in cases of gravely ill newborns. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2009; 19(70): 33-40. [in Persian]

Cuttini M, Casotto V, Orzalesi M, Euronic Study Group. Ethical issues in neonatal intensive care and physicians' practices: a European perspective. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006, 95(452):42-6.

Cuttini M, Nadai M, Kaminski M, et al. End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group. Lancet. 2000; 355(9221): 2112-8.

Bell EF, Bivoleanu AR, Stamatin M, Stoicescu SM. Physician attitudes in Romania toward withholding and withdrawal of intensive care for infants with very poor prognosis. Am J Perinatol. 2014, 31(6): 477-82.

Zamboni G. [Bioethics, deontology, and law in neonatal intensive care]. Pediatr Med Chir. 2002; 24(5): 346-51.

Kathryn L, Weise KW, Alexander L, et al. Guidance on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics. 2017; 140(3): e20171905.

Cummings J, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(3): 588–95.

How to Cite
Nayeri F, Asghari F, Shariat M, Baser A, Janani L, Tanha K, Ebrahim B. Factors influencing the attitudes of NICU physicians toward care of neonates with very poor prognosis. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 12.
Original Article(s)