Islamic jurisprudential and ethical considerations of practicing medical procedures on nearly dead patients; Part I- the theoretical section
Medical training, Dying patient, Death agony, Islamic jurisprudential rules
End-of-life care and protection of the patient in the near-death moments are part of a patient’s rights and the duties of the medical staff. As the beginning and end of human life are most sensitive moments, there are various religious rules associated with them. The ethical issues regarding practicing medical procedures on nearly dead patients are of particular complexity and are consistent with invaluable and profoundly religious recommendations. In addition, the purpose of medical training is to provide physicians with the knowledge and skills necessary to practice appropriately and within legal and ethical frameworks. Therefore, respecting patients’ cultural and religious beliefs is an ethically accepted principle in the health systems of different countries and is the basis of respect for human dignity. The present study used a qualitative content analysis to explain how to practice medical procedures on a dying or nearly dead patient in accordance with Islamic jurisprudential rules. It was finally concluded that according to the Islamic jurisprudential rules of “authority”, “no harm”, “necessity”, and “public interest”, procedures performed on a dying patient could be used for training purposes under certain circumstances. Nevertheless, such activities should only be done with the patient’s permission and provided they cause no unnecessary harassment, and they may take place in the absence of alternative methods.
Emami H, Aghdasi M, Asousheh A. Electronic learning in medical education. Research in Medicine. 2009; 33(2):102-11. [in Persian]
Larijani B. Health Care Professional and Ethical Issues. Tehran: Baraye Farda; 2004, Vol.1, p.34. [in Persian]
Berger JT, Rosner F, Cassell EJ. Ethics of practicing medical procedures on newly dead and nearly dead patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17(10):774-8.
Sadeghi H, Nosratian Ahoor M. Subject analysis of death. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013; 6(1): 23-36. [in Persian]
Heidari MR, Anoosheh M, Azad Armaki T, Mohammadi E. Nurses experiences in the care of end stage patients. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011; 4(6): 75-86. [in Persian]
Rafipoor F. Special Research Techniques in Social Sciences, 1st ed. Tehran: Enteshar Publications; 2003. p. 107-10. [in Persian]
Hoseini SM. A Dictionary of Terms in Islamic Jurisprudence / Arabic – Persian, with English Equivalents, 4th ed. Tehran: Soroush; 2010, p.450. [in Persian]
Al-Asfahani R, Al-Husayn IM. [Mufradat Alfaze al-Quran]. Beirut: Dar al-Shamiyah; 1992, p. 241. [in Arabic]
Bahrani Y. [Al-Hadaiq Al-Nazrah Fi Ahkame Al-Etrato Al-Taher]. Qom: Jamea Modarresin; 1984, Vol.3, p. 352. [in Arabic]
Najafi MH (Saheb Javaher). [Jawaher Al-Kalam Fi Sharh Sharaea Al-Eslam]. Beirut: Dar Ehya Al-Torath al-Arabi; 1981, Vol.4, p.6. [in Arabic].
Qomi Sadugh M. [Man La Yahzaru Al-Faqhih], 2nd ed. Qom: Daftare Entesharate Eslami; 1992, Vol.1, p. 132–135. [in Arabic]
Ibn Manzur M. [Lisan Al-Arab], 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar Sadir; 2000, Vol.5, p. 29. [in Arabic]
Sachedina A. Islamic Biomedical Ethics Principles and Application. UK: Oxford University Press; 2011, p. 256-276.
Holy Quran. Osveh Press, 3rd ed. Qom: 2009. [in Arabic]
Tarabulusi A. [Al-Mohazzab]. Qom: Jamea Modarresin; 1985, Vol.1, p.84.[in Arabic]
Tusi M. [Al-Mabsoot Fi Feghhe Al-Imamyeh], 3rd ed. Tehran: Al-Maktabe al-Mortazaviyeh Le-Ehyae al-Asare al-Jaafarie Publishing; 1968, Vol.1, p.77. [in Arabic]
Tusi M. [Al-Nihayah Fi Mojjarad Al-Fighhe Va Al-Fatawe], 2nd ed. Beirut: Darul Kitab Al-Arabiyah; 1979, p. 63. [in Arabic]
Husaini Seestani A. Rules related to dying person. [cited 2018 October]; available from: https://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2180/
Mousavi Khoei SA. [Resaleh Tozihol Masael]. Tehran: Moassese Matbouate Ali Akbare Elmi; 2003, Vol.2, p. 69. [in Arabic]
Helli SR. [Falahol Saele Va Najah Al-Masael]. Qom: Entesharate Daftare Tablighate Eslami. 1985, p. 77. [in Arabic]
Mousavi Khomeini SR. [Tahrir al-Wasilah], 1st ed. Qom: Moassese Matbouate Darolelm; 1989, Vol.1, p. 65. [in Arabic]
Shubairi Zanjani SM. [Al-masael Al-Shariah]. Qom: Nashre Al-Feghahe; 2008, p. 128-9. [in Arabic]
Gomes AP, Rego S, Palácios M, Siqueira-Batista R. Bioethical analysis of the use of newly dead patients in medical training. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2010; 56(1): 11-6.
Draper H, Ives J, Parle J, Ross N. Medical education and patients’ responsibilities: back to the future? J Med Ethics. 2008; 34(2):116-9.
Jagsi R, Lehmann LS. The ethics of medical education. BMJ. 2004; 329:332.
Howe A, Anderson J. Involving patients in medical education. BMJ. 2003; 327:326.
Doyal L. Closing the gap between professional teaching and practice: a policy can help protect students from being asked to behave unethically. BMJ. 2001; 322 (7288): 685-6.
Jetley AV, Marco CA. Practicing Medical Procedures on the Newly or Nearly Dead. In: Jesus J. Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012, p.299-310.
Marco CA, Brennan JA, Chipman CD, et al. Teaching procedures using the newly dead. ACEP Clinical & Practice Management. 2003.
Moein M. A Persian Dictionary, 25th ed. Tehran: Entesharate Amir Kabir; 2009, Vol.1, p. 153. [ in Persian]
Moein M. A Persian Dictionary. 25th ed. Tehran: Entesharate Amir Kabir; 2009, Vol.3, p. 2929 [ in Persian]
Haqiqatpur H. A Research concerning the principles of the right for human dignity in sources of rules. Journal of Fiqh and Usul. 2013; 45(92): 9- 30. [in Persian]
Montazeri HA. [Resalat Al-Hoghogh Fi Al-Islam]. Tehran: Entesharate Saraee; 2014, pp. 29- 39. [in Arabic]
Bayat M, Aghili M. Transmission of Religious Concepts Ethics with Human Nobility Approach. Iranian Journal of the Knowledge Studies in the Islamic University. 2014; 18(58): 77- 94. [ in Persian]
Yadollahpour B. Human dignity and its consequences in the Holy Qur'an. [cited 2018 October]; available from: http://www.ipedr.com/vol10/103-S10081.pdf
Naghibi A. Elements of human dignity in the Qur’an and practuce of the fourteen infallibles (AS). Seraje Monir. 2012; 3(8):46- 61. [in Persian]
Suranari H. The globalization of economy and the implications of the principle of human dignity in the development right. Allameh. 2010; 10(24); 125-52. [in Persian]
Jafari Tabrizi MT. A Comparative Study of Universal Human Rights: From the Viewpoints of Islam and the West. Tehran: Alhoda International Publisher; 1999.
Amid Zanjani AA, Tavakoli MM. Innate dignity of human and Islamic human rights. Law Quarterly. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science. 2008; 37(4): 161- 89. [in Persian]
Rahiminejad I. The Islamic view on human dignity. Marifat-i Hoghoughi. 2012; 1(2): 113- 26. [ in Persian]
Ibrahimzadeh Amoli A. Human in the perspective of Islam and Humanism. Qabasat. 2008; (44): 51-70. [in Persian]
Afzali MA. Human dignity and euthanasia in Islamic ethics. J Mazandaran University Medical Sciences. 2010; 20(78): 83- 95. [in Persian]
Ibn Manzur M. [Lisan al-arab]. 3rd ed. Beirut: Dar Sadir; 1993, Vol.7, p. 320, Vol. 4, p. 483, Vol.2, p. 517. [in Arabic]
Majlisi MB. [Bihar al-Anwar]. Beirut: Dar Ihya Turath al Arabi Beirut; 2000, Vol.2. [in Arabic]
Alidoost A, Ebrahimirad M. Study of the rule of control and its scope. Islamic Law. 2011; 7 (24):7- 31. [in Persian]
Taheri H. [Ghwaed Feghh], 2nd ed. Qom: Daftare Entesharate Eslami; 2015, Vol.1, p. 99-105, Vol.2, p. 157-9. [in Persian]
Mohaghegh Damad SM. The rules of Islamic jurisprudence. Tehran: Samt; 1995, p. 98. [in Persian]
Majlisi MB. [Bihar al-Anwar]. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dar Ehya Al-Torath Al-Arabi; 1982, Vol.29, p. 407, Vol.5, p. 303. [in Arabic]
Horr Ameli M. [Wasail al-Shia], 1st ed. Qom: Moassese Aale Al-Bayt; 1988, Vol.14, p. 572. [in Arabic]
Mohaqeq Karaki ABM. [Jamea Al-Maqased Fi Sharhe Al-Qavaed], 2nd ed. Qom: Moassese Aal Al- Bayt; 1993, Vol.4, p.42. [in Arabic]
Najafi MH. [Jawaher al-kalam fi sharh sharaea al-eslam]. 7th ed. Beirut: Dar ehya al-torath al-arabi; 1983, Vol.22, pp. 168, 344, 478. [in Arabic]
Tusi M. [Al-Khilaf], 1st ed. Qom: Jamea Modarresin; 1986, Vol.3, p.176. [in Arabic]
Abedi Sarasiya A. The Principle of sovereignty and its role in correcting the newly-emerged contracts (with special reference to Imam Khomeini’s viewpoints). Pajouheshnameh Matin. 2017; 19(75): 129-154. [in Persian]
Momen Qomi M. [Kalimat Sadideh Fi Masail Jadideh]. Qom: Entesharate Eslami; 1994, pp.163-78. [in Arabic]
Kaldjian LC, Wu BJ, Jekel JF, Kaldjian EP, Duffy TP. Insertion of femoral-vein catheters for practice by medical house officers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(27):2088-91.
Rathor MY, Rani MF, Shah AS, Leman WI, Akter SF, Omar AM. The principle of autonomy as related to personal decision making concerning health and research from an ‘Islamic Viewpoint’. JIMA. 2011; 43: 27-34.
Potter J. Does the Iranian model of kidney donation compensation work as an ethical global model? Online Journal of Health Ethics. 2015; 11(1):11.
Mohamadrezaei M. A critical study on Kant`s view of Human autonomy and freedom. Religious Anthropology. 2011; 8(25): 21-33. [in Persian]
Shariati S, Ensafi Mehrbani S. An Investigation into “compulsion “and “free will” in Islamic school and its educational implications. Qur'anic Knowledge. 2014; 5(17): 7- 29. [in Persian]
Mesbah Yazdi MT. Theology, Cosmology, Anthropology (Meshkat). Qom: Moassese Imam Khomeini; 2014, pp. 374-81. [in Persian]
Mesbah Yazdi MT. Teaching Philosophy. Tehran: Sazeman Tablighat Eslami; 2009, Vol.2, p. 378. [in Persian]
Tabatabai MH. [Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur'an]. Qom: Jameae Modarresin Fi Al-Hozeh Al-Elmiyeh; 1971, Vol.20, p.122-4. [in Arabic]
Mohaghegh Damad SM. The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence: Civil Section, 39th ed. Tehran: Markaz Nashre Olome Eslami; 2013, pp.131-51. [in Persian]
Mohammady A. Rules of Islamic law, 11th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2010, p.146. [in Persian]
Kulayni M. [Al-kafi], 4th ed. Tehran: Dar-Ol Kutub Al-Eslamiyah; 1986, Vol.5, p. 294. [in Arabic]
Horr Ameli MBH. [Wasail Al- Shia], 1st ed. Qom: Moassese Aale Al-Bayt; 1988, Vol.25, p. 428. [in Arabic]
Zeraat A. Civil Jurisprudence Rules. Tehran: Jungle Publications; 2009, p.148. [in Persian]
Karimi A, Shabani Kandsari H. The logical relationship between no loss principle in Islamic jurisprudence and the principle of abuse of rights in western legal systems. Quarterly Journal of Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western law. 2015; 1(2): 135-66. [in Persian]
Alidoust A. Islamic Jurisprudence (Fegh) and Expediency,2nd ed. Tehran: Publishing Organization of Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought; 2011, p. 122. [in Persian]
Jafari Langroudi MJ. Law Terminology, 6th ed. Tehran: Ganje Danesh Publication; 1996, p. 416. [in Persian]
Mohaghegh Damad SM. The Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence penal section, 19th ed. Tehran: Markaze Nashre Olome Eslami; 2011, p.123-33. [in Persian]
Farzaneh A. The role of necessity and urgency rule in the legitimacy of exerting non-proprietorship by the government. The Quarterly Journal of Jurisprudence & History of Civilization. 2012; 8(31): 9- 31. [in Persian]
Safaei S, Abbasi M. No harm principle in Islamic Jurisprudence and law and its usage in biomedical Jurisprudence. Journal of Bioethics. 2015; 5(17): 33- 64. [in Persian]
Bahrami Ahmadi H. Islamic Jurisprudence Rules, 2nd ed. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University; 2009, Vol.1, p.179. [in Persian]
Qomi Sadugh M. [Al-Khisal]. Edited by Ali Akbar Ghaffari, 1st ed. Qom: Jamea Modarresin; 1983, Vol.2, p.417. [ in Arabic]
Torayhi F. [Majma al-Bahrayn], 3rd ed. Tehran: Ketabforoshi Mortazavi; 1995, Vol.2, p.389. [ in Arabic]
Mohaghegh Hilli J. [Maareja al-Usul]. Qom: Moassese Aal Al-Bayt; 1982, p.221. [ in Arabic]
Pirhayati H. The place rule of expedient in Iranian criminal law. Judgment. 2015; 15(81): 131-154. [in Persian]
Farhangi MH. The Relation between jurisprudence and common legal sources and essentials of sovereignty. Philosophical Investigations. 2006; 3(7):79-106. [in Persian]
Salarzaei AH, Janjan F. Criminal policy originated from the Holly Quran. Crime Prevention Studies Quarterly. 2012; 6(21): 99-118.[in Persian]